Vodafone also refuted the claims of Jio that it has a cost advantage in the region of 70 per cent compared to the established 2G, 3G and 4G operators. “There is no evidence — either Indian or international — to support such a claim. If this was indeed true, there would be a number of 4G-only operators emerging around the world, which is not the case,” the letter said. Vodafone added that the costs of the new entrant are higher than any other operator, whether in terms of employees (approximately double that of Vodafone India when including outsourced employees) or infrastructure (significant sole tenancy approach versus the tower-sharing approach adopted by other operators).
Colao said Jio was assuming that it can recover its costs many years into the future.
However, continued under-pricing of services leads to a rapidly increasing cost per subscriber, recovery of which will require higher average revenue per user in the future, which is unfeasible and unrealistic. “It is undesirable for a critical core industry like telecom to be regulated based on the ambition of a new operator with no history of financial sustenance,” Vodafone said.
The letter added there should be no further reduction in IUC as it would destabilise the sector, defeat government rural coverage objectives and cause huge inconvenience to citizens, particularly in rural India.