The share of retail loans in overall book has increased from 42 per cent to 61 per cent, in June quarter (Q1), after four years. It surpasses HDFC Bank, known to be the market leader in retail loans. Further, the proportion of unsecured retail loans was contained at 13.3 per cent of total retail loans (though it doubled from 6.6 per cent in FY15), provides comfort at a time when delinquencies in retail loans are slowly inching up.
“The bank is comfortable with the growth in unsecured lending portfolio, given its under-penetration among existing clients (at 8 per cent of loans) and stable quality trends,” say analysts at CLSA.
Yet, one should keep an eye out on these numbers, as gross non-performing assets (NPA) ratio for retail loans rose to 1.9 per cent in Q1, marking a jump of 12 bps year-on-year. In FY15, the corresponding number was 2.02 per cent.
However, ICICI Bank trumps its rivals, which have unsecured loans upwards of 15 per cent.
In addition, amid debates over the impact of linking loans to external benchmarks on profitability, ICICI Bank’s share of low cost current account- savings account (CASA) deposits — at 45 per cent in Q1 (50 per cent a year-ago) — could help mitigate margin compression.
Higher share of non-CASA deposits may limit ability of banks to reduce deposit rates in a declining rate trajectory. In Q1, the bank fared better than peers on this parameter, too.
Yet, it won’t be fair to assume all is fine. Share of loans to relatively weaker corporates (rated below 'A') account for 29 per cent of total book and has increased from 28 per cent in FY19.
With fresh trouble brewing by the day, investors need to be watchful. A further increase in retail NPA ratio may test investors’ faith on the stock. “ICICI Bank is showing promise of better underwriting at this point of the cycle, although we would need a few quarters to establish relative comfort,” say analysts at Kotak Institutional Equities.
The recent rally of 10 per cent in a month may also prompt investors to wait for a better entry point, though its 2.6x FY20 price-to-book valuation isn’t expensive compared to peers (3-4x FY20 book).