JSW’s readiness to pay is a change from an earlier stance. In June, after the Covid-19 pandemic, it had sought flexibility in payment schedule for its bid, but lenders had rejected the demand. Between then and now, however, the fortunes of the steel industry have changed with prices touching a two-year high and spreads at a three-year high.
The closure of BPSL would add about three million tonnes capacity to JSW Steel’s existing 18 million tonnes.
The additional outgo of Rs 400 crore would be distributed from the earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) accrued to the company during the CIRP.
“There is a difference of opinion among lenders over the Rs 400 crore. Whether they will decide to accept it or wait for an outcome in the Supreme Court remains to be seen,” a lender said.
The matter pertaining to distribution of EBITDA during CIPR is in the apex court. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) while approving JSW’s resolution plan in September 2019 had said that profits earned by running the corporate debtor during the CIRP are to be redistributed in accordance with the Essar Steel judgment of July 4, 2019.
The Essar order had said that where the successful resolution applicant is not paying the total dues to creditors but pays lesser than the claim, the profit should be distributed among all creditors including financial and operational.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal – where JSW had appealed against the NCLT order – had, however, allowed JSW Steel
to retain the EBITDA. Subsequently, it was challenged in the Supreme Court by former promoter, Sanjay Singal, in February 2020.
Singal in his appeal, had pegged EBITDA at Rs 3,000 crore, and said that it should distributed among creditors.
He is not the only party to have raised a flag over the JSW transaction in the apex court. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) is also contesting applicability of the newly-inserted Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
(IBC) – which gives immunity to the corporate debtor – to the JSW-Bhushan deal.
According to the ED, the amendment came into force after the acquisition was approved by the NCLT last year. About a month after the approval, however, the ED issued a provisional attachment order for assets of BPSL valued at Rs 4,025.23 crore.
While the legal points will be taken up in court, JSW in the meantime, is looking for a closure of the resolution process with the proposal to lenders to make good of the upside in steel.
. Rs 19,350 crore to financial creditors against admitted claims of Rs 47,157.99 crore
. Rs 350 crore to operational creditors
. Close transaction against bank guarantee/indemnity bond by lenders
. Additional Rs 400 crore to financial creditors
. Amount to distributed from BPSL EBITDA
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.