He contended that the SIAC rules themselves contemplate an Emergency Arbitrator. That contemplation in the rules by virtue of on provision in law becomes a sacred agreement between the parties. Words of the arbitration agreement will have rules of engagement as part of itself. He said the argument of inherent lack of jurisdiction is thus flawed.
He asked what is the fact needed here for an Emergency Arbitrator? It is consent, agreement. All Arbitrations are founded on consent. When consent exists, Subramanian said, there cannot be an inherent lack of jurisdiction.
He said there is a third principle which was overlooked. It applies to courts and arbitrators. Courts and arbitrators can determine their own jurisdiction. He said, to claim the award is a nullity because there is an inherent lack of jurisdiction is contrary to Part I (Arbitration Act) and the SIAC Rules. To say that emergency arbitration is foreign to Part I is completely misconceived.
In August, Kishore Biyani-headed retail conglomerate Future Group struck a Rs 24,713-crore asset sale deal with Mukesh-Ambani led Reliance Industries
Ltd (RIL). Jeff Bezos-led Amazon
then sent a legal notice to Future, alleging the retailer’s deal breached an agreement with the American e-commerce giant. This was because last year, Amazon had bought a 49 per cent stake in one of Future’s unlisted firms Future Coupons Pvt Ltd (FCPL) for Rs 1,430 crore.
Subramanium argued that there was an agreement between the parties which was consciously made. FCPL is a wholesale company dealing with coupons and gift vouchers. It had some relation with FRL.
Asking who was in control of Future, he said the Emergency Arbitrator found that (the) moving spirit is the Biyanis, whether it is FRL, or FCPL.
The rights which were guaranteed to Amazon under the agreement included that it will not sell the assets to a restricted person (Reliance).
Subramanium also referred to Part I of the Arbitration Act and read the definition of "arbitration agreement.” He said an Emergency Arbitrator by consent of parties can be a sole arbitrator. He argued if in an arbitration agreement, the parties agree to an emergency agreement, there is no inherent lack of jurisdiction.
“After having failed there, they (Future) are here,” said Subramanium, according to Bar & Bench. “The suit is filed after the award was rendered.” He said Future consciously appeared before the Emergency Arbitrator.
He said the law contemplates that even an interim order, even by the emergency Arbitrator, will have the efficacy of the court. He said the entire argument of inherent lack of jurisdiction is completely unfounded. To say at Amazon is not interested in sustaining FRL. Subramanium said is contrary to the record. The Emergency Arbitrator after examining all correspondence said that Amazon was interested in finding a solution.
East India Company
Subramanium said Amazon has invested $6.5 billion all over India. Some comments were made which were misplaced. “What was being argued (was) that it was some greedy entity. We created 900,000 jobs,” said Subramanium, according to Bar & Bench. He also said that the rhetoric should be kept aside on Amazon being called "East India Company.
It was also being projected that FRL is a listed company and it doesn't matter where the money is coming from, is not correct, according to Subramanium. Earlier arguments were made Amazon did not have the capacity to invest anymore and FRL needed to be saved, but Amazon was genuinely finding a solution. “We were the ones attempting to help,” said Subramanium. “We introduced Samara, an investor. A term sheet was offered to solve the problems.”
He said promoters made Amazon believe that they are interested in Samara but it got to know that they have chosen to go with a restricted person (Reliance).
Senior advocate Vikram Nankani for FCPL told the court that there were certain factual corrections and it has challenged the jurisdiction of the emergency Arbitrator.
which was represented by senior advocate Harish Salve told the court the award (by Singapore Arbitrator) has no existence in Indian law. He argued that Amazon has no right to control any voting in FRL. Its representations are false and need to be injuncted.
“Today the endeavour of East India Company
is against the competition,” said Salve. He said Amazon has an agreement with FCPL. The obligation of the promoter (Biyanis) to Amazon cannot be attributed to the company (FRL).
“For me, FRL has not received a dollar from you (Amazon). I got it from FCPL and it has no objection. You can scream at Biyanis,” said Salve.
The day’s highlights:
Future Retail (FRL) submissions are flawed because they overlook the premises of Arbitration law.
Arbitration is founded on consent of parties and hence an agreement.
The parties had chosen Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) rules.
Amazon has invested $6.5 billion all over India.
It created 9 lakh jobs and not some greedy entity or East India Company.
It introduced Samara, an investor to Future and term sheet was offered to solve its problems.
Promoters made Amazon believe that they are interested in Samara, but Amazon got to know that Future has chosen to go with a restricted person (Reliance).
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.