Private players say this an instance of government going back on its contractual commitments The government that time wanted companies to invest in exploration of oil and gas with associated risks. The government exercised its “back in right” after a commercial discovery, without paying for exploration expenditure. This right was largely in the form of a 30 per cent equity for the government nominee — Oil and Natural Gas Corporation or Oil India, which were also the original leaseholders of these blocks. The government would allow recovery of cost from production, take a share of profit petroleum and the rest was to be proportionately shared among the partners.
To attract investors, companies were exempt from all taxes including royalty, cess and import duties, other than income tax. While PSCs of some blocks like that of Ravva capped royalty at Rs 481 a tonne and cess at Rs 900 to be shared by all the parties, for most others ONGC and OIL paid the full levies, including the share of private companies.
Over the years even though the government increased cess and royalty, it issued a separate notification maintaining the cap for PSCs where the levees were specified. The objective was to provide an attractive fiscal regime under which companies paid only income tax.
CHANGE OF PLAN
Extension policy for 28 discovered fields
Govt share: profit petroleum during extended period will be 10% higher than original contract
Royalty and cess:
to be paid at prevailing rates by contractors in proportion to participating interest
PREREQUISITE FOR EXTENSION
*Test or commercial production has begun
*Development plan for discoveries in mining lease submitted
*Firm exploration programme has been submitted
*The extension would be for 10 yrs for oil and gas fields or the economic life of fields
For the two state-owned companies, which got a share in production without the associated risks, the levies became a pain point. Returns from some these aging fields started to become negative after the payment of royalty and cess. They could not justify approving the development plans of these fields to their boards since higher production meant a higher levy. The changes put in place by the extension policy was driven by these considerations.
ONGC officials argue the change in fiscal terms does not amount to the government reneging on contracts. “Under PSCs, the contracts can be extended after renegotiation of terms. If the private companies do not agree by that they can choose not to extend it,” said an official. This argument, however, can be used both ways. If the original terms are unsuitable for ONGC and OIL they can quit, too.
A senior executive in one of the private companies involved in these joint venture PSCs says the state-owned companies have a share as a government nominee so they should not look at only commercial considerations but promote production from these fields. “The government made ONGC and OIL the nominee in most of the blocks for their rights. However, in reality, this nominee could be any party. Given that the nominee was acquiring a stake in a successful discovery without incurring any expenditure, they were made to bear royalty and cess on entire production throughout the term of the PSC,” he says.
The oil and gas space has moved on since the early 1990s and private companies have a full stake in blocks without any government nominee. Over $5 billion has been invested in these fields, which has helped the country reduce its import dependence. Production from these blocks constitute roughly 25 per cent of India’s oil production but since these are aging fields, the economics of operation and development are changing for both the state-owned companies and the private operators.
Cairn Vedanta, for instance, could see a 33 per cent hit on their revenues with two of their blocks—Cambay and Ravva—coming under the new policy. These blocks are due for extension in 2023 and 2019. The company had to accept the changed terms in favour of ONGC for its flagship asset at Barmer when the government insisted on it as a condition for approval of the Vedanta takeover of Cairn India.
Hindustan Oil and Exploration Company (HOEC), Tata Petrodyne and Assam Company are among those that are also impacted by the new policy. According to one estimate, the new regime will effectively transfer over 35 per cent of revenue from private players to the two government companies.
“Our government has made significant progress through HELP and OPAL which will have a positive impact in the medium to long term. However, with the recent recovery in oil prices, India’s import bill is increasing and the government will need to balance the trade and fiscal deficits. Creating incentives for existing domestic production, maintaining sanctity of contract and reforming the approval processes will have a more immediate effect. This will also be crucial to attract further investment,” says Sudhir Mathur, CEO, Vedanta Cairn Oil & Gas.
One way out of this Catch 22 situation is to reimburse the levies to the state-owned companies who in any case will not find operating most of these fields viable if private companies quit. P Elango, managing director, HOEC, says, “PSUs have a valid commercial argument but in order to maintain the contract sanctity and same fiscal terms, the government should create a mechanism for reimbursing them the levies they pay. A kitty could be set aside from government's oil sector revenues for this purpose."
Since the 1990s, government policies have largely moved away from state-controlled dominance with the New Exploration and Licensing Policy and now OPAL allowing full control to private companies. A fair approach to the extension for the 28 PSCs will require changes that are more attuned to the liberal policy regime that now prevails.