“The adjudicating authority has merely to see the records of the information utility or other evidence produced by the financial creditor to satisfy itself that default has occurred,” the NCLAT said quoting a judgment from the Supreme Court.
The move to curb the number of interventions at the admission stage to just the financial creditor and the corporate debtor is a positive move, Founder of Witworth Insolvency Professionals Nilesh Sharma said.
“This move will help the NCLT adhere to the 14-day timeline set by the code to dispose-off cases either by admitting it or dismissing the case. If the financial creditor is moving an application, he will submit proof of claims. In such a case, there is no question of dispute. If is unlikely that the banks and non-banking financial companies
will fudge records,” Sharma said.
It is because of repeated interjections that the NCLT takes a minimum of 30 days to either admit or dispose-off applications for insolvency. It would be interesting to see the approach the adjudicating authority takes in case the application is moved by the operational creditor, insolvency professionals said.
“Around the world, if there is a default, insolvency proceedings can be commenced. In India, admission gets delayed as all kinds of people raise all kinds of issues. Admission of cases should be on day 1 if the advance copy has been served on debtor and it does not dispute debt default,” Sumant Batra, an insolvency professional, said. If the corporate debtor’s objections against the default of debt are found to be frivolous, heavy costs should be imposed, he said.
Though the decision of not allowing any interventions at the admission stage should help improve the timelines under corporate insolvency resolution process, it could also be against public interest, Saurabh Kumar, Partner at IndusLaw said.
“An intervenor could many times have an important argument and would need to be heard before a corporate insolvency resolution process is admitted,” he said.
The restrictions placed by NCLAT in its judgment is only under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code as of now, which ensures that quick hearing is given to the financial creditor when all other avenues seem closed to it. Hearing third parties at this stage can indeed delay the process, Daizy Chawla, Senior Partner, Singh & Associates said.
“Having said so, complete restriction does intrude on rights of litigators or operational creditors. In such cases, however, the adjudicating authority hearing such applications will have to take judicious approach whether to hear the parties or dispose such the applications as filed,” Chawla said.
The options for operational creditors are open once the claim is admitted, Punit Dutt Tyagi, Executive Partner at law firm Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan said.
“After the petition is admitted, the Resolution Professional will advertise and the operational creditor can always go and place their claims. Only the corporate debtor alone can admit or dispute the claim at the admission stage. Operational Creditor has no role at that stage,” Tyagi said.