The RBI in February this year mandated banks to classify even one day’s delay in debt servicing as default. The notification mandates resolution proceedings against stressed accounts to be completed in 180 days.
“The RBI said the circular did not not stop restructuring of stressed power assets even if there was a default, and restructuring is possible within the timeframe,” Kumar told the media after the meeting.
The Union power ministry had earlier urged the RBI to provide extension to the sector after R K Singh, Minister of State for Power and New & Renewable Energy, had called the RBI resolution for bad loans “impractical” and demanded changes.
“The heavily regulated nature of the power sector and the fact that the present crisis is caused more by externalities, the power sector would need a differential resolution path. The relaxations would provide a window for chalking out a time-bound action plan required to salvage a significant portion of the power portfolio,” said A K Khurana, director general, Association of Power Producers (APP).
Currently, three plans are being worked out for resolving stress in the power sector.
State Bank of India (SBI), which has the highest exposure to the sector, is planning to select assets for its pilot scheme wherein it, along with a funding agency, will take over the debt, hire an operations and management (O&M) company, and sell them later.
SBI has shortlisted 11 power projects to which it has lent to start the process.
Power Finance Corporation (PFC), on the other hand, has invited an expression of interest (EoI) for three assets and has received an initial interest from marquee global investors.
Another sector lender, REC, which has a minimal exposure to power generation assets, is also planning a bail-out scheme at the behest of the Ministry of Power.
It is learnt that REC will form a special purpose vehicle to take over the debts of stressed assets and issue bonds against the same.
Of the 40,000 Mw identified by the finance ministry as stressed, around 10,000 Mw are without any power-purchase agreements. Stressed assets of around 8,500 Mw have made no significant progress, raising questions over their award process. Resolution is possible in another 11,000 Mw.
IPPAI petitions against RBI circular
Independent Power Producers Association of India (IPPAI), which petitioned in the Allahabad High Court against the RBI February circular, was also one of the participants in the meeting. The industry lobby group had a stretched list of demands from the government – from creating a corpus for bailing out private players to creating a task force, removing cost plus regime under which state owned NTPC is awarded projects. IPPAI also blamed NTPC for gold plating their tariff and “backdoor entry” in the sector through government support. It asked the government to make room for private players by removing “unterminable PPA” of NTPC.