Four new projects with total capacity of 8.8 Gw began construction in the country in 2019, and all have received funding from PFC and REC
Power Finance Corporation (PFC) continues to fund non-performing assets
in thermal coal sector some of which are obsolete and economically unviable projects that run the risk of turning into stranded assets in the future.
“When India’s government-owned PFC
acquired the REC (Rural Electrification Corporation), it formed the country’s largest non-banking finance company (NBFC) and a critically important lender for India’s power sector, with a total asset book approaching $100 billion as of last December (2020),” said Kashish Shah, energy finance analyst with US-based think tank Institute for Energy Economics & Financial Analysis (IEEFA).
and REC have lent extensively to coal-fired power projects, with Rs 3.43 trillion ($49 billion), or 54 per cent of their total loan books exposed to thermal power.
This lending has in turn accumulated an extensive list of non-performing assets
on their balance sheets, amounting to roughly Rs 47,454 crore ($6.8 billion) as of December 2019.
“But IEEFA views the extent of their stranded asset risk significantly higher than this as India’s thermal power generation sector continues to trouble the country’s banks, accounting for $40-60 billion in stranded assets. And with India’s thermal power generation sector under severe stress from carrying those $40-60 billion of non-performing assets
(NPAs), financing from private banking institutions to the sector has dried up,” Shah added.
Transcripts from PFC
investor meetings from 2017-18 reveal that PFC has provided refinancing loans to NTPC’s Meja plant (1,320 Mw) of Rs 3,700 crore ($500 million) and Raichur Yermarus Power project (1,600 Mw) of Rs 1,700 crore ($260 million), a project of Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd (KPCL) and BHEL.
Four new projects with total capacity of 8.8 Gw began construction in the country in 2019, and all have received funding from PFC and REC. As PFC is the lender of last resort for new coal power, all these projects received lending support from PFC and REC, underlining a key development in India — lending from the private sector for coal-fired project proposals has diminished to negligible levels, the IEEFA report noted.
“IEEFA views PFC’s lending to new existing or new thermal power developments as extremely risky in light of the expected tariffs on these projects being 60-70 per cent above the prevailing renewable energy tariffs of Rs 2.50-2.80 per kilowatt hour (kWh). IEEFA questions how PFC can expect to get a viable total project return over the 40-year life of thermal power plants given the uncompetitive tariffs these projects require, particularly in light of rising financial distress at distribution companies
(discoms) which are demanding an ever-lower cost of procuring new power generation,” said Shah.
On the positive side, PFC and REC have together lent Rs 33,759 crore ($4.8 billion) to renewable projects as of December 2019, with some five per cent of loans outstanding. Given India’s massive renewable target of 450 Gw by 2029-30, and the associated funding requirements for the expansion and modernisation of the national grid system, IEEFA estimates $500-700 billion of new investment is needed. This will also require work from smaller regional developers that provides a significant opportunity for a rapid step-up in funding from PFC and REC.