While the resolution got 100 per cent promoter votes, over 83 per cent of public shareholders, mainly institutional investors, voted ‘against’. Overall, the resolution got only 43.1 per cent votes, failing to reach the 50 per cent threshold required to pass an ‘ordinary resolution.’
Most proxy advisory firms had recommended ‘against’ vote on the resolution, raising red flags over his poor attendance at board and other committee meetings.
“No concern regarding profile and time commitment. However, director (Bhatia) has low attendance,” said Stakeholders Empowerment Services (SES), in its voting advisory note.
In 2019-20, Bhatia attended only three of the six board meetings held by STFC, where he served as non-executive director. Also, his attendance in audit committee and corporate social responsibility meetings was just 40 per cent and 33 per cent, respectively.
“A director is no more an ornament for the company or a badge for an individual. Investors expect directors to be more engaged with companies
whose boards they serve on. In the absence of any parameter on this, board attendance is seen as a surrogate measure of board-level participation,” said Amit Tandon, managing director (MD), Institutional Investor Advisory Services (IiAS), which too had recommended an against vote.
Bhatia couldn’t be reached immediately for a comment. Voting advisory firms expect a director to attend at least 75 per cent of board meetings.
STFC’s management was batting for Bhatia’s reappointment despite his sub-par attendance.
“It would be unfair to arrive at any judgement or vote against recommendation solely based on the guideline that he did not attend 75 per cent board meetings of STFC in FY 2019-20. This will not be in the larger interest of shareholders of the company,” STFC had said.
Justifying his reappointment, the Chennai-based firm had said “Bhatia has made significant contributions for success and excellent performance of the company. The management has highly benefited from his association, guidance and advice through discussions and deliberations on strategic matters.”
Voting advisory firms are often criticised by companies
for strictly following quantitative metrics such as attendance, age and number of director positions held.
In 2018, the issue had come to the fore after some global voting advisory firms had recommended ‘against’ vote on HDFC’s resolution to re-appoint Deepak Parekh as director as he held board positions in eight other companies.
Besides heading TPG Capital Asia, which manages $6 billion in assets, Bhatia serves as director in about a dozen other entities. Before joining TPG in April 2002, Bhatia was head of GE Capital India, another private equity. He had joined STFC’s board as nominee director of TPG in 2006 after the PE firm acquired an indirect stake in STFC.