As on end-March, Tata Steel’s consolidated net debt was Rs 69,000 crore. That of JSW Steel was Rs 36,000 crore. In the case of JSW, despite consistently rising revenue and operating profit, the company has not been able to significantly cut debt. Tata Steel, the country’s oldest in the sector, has taken timely non-cash impairment charges, sold non-core assets and even refinanced its loans.
However, it has not been able to bring its balance sheet in a healthy position. In fact, after its recent earnings performance, brokerages decided deleveraging would remain slow as realisations are expected to remain weak due to lower steel prices.
Tata Steel has been unable to keep its revenue moving consistently up in the past three-four years. Operating profits have been on a roller-coaster ride, leading the company into losses in some quarters. All domestic steel firms have been working in a hostile business climate for quite some time. Cheap imports from China, a surplus producer, and via free trade agreements with Japan and Korea have crippled it, says the industry, as the already subdued demand scenario has been getting captured by imported products rather than domestically production.
“Sales of steel firms have been poor owing to loss of share in the domestic market to cheaper imports,” said a Kotak Institutional Equities report. “Imports increased 55 per cent year-on-year to 1.7 million tonnes in April-May while exports declined 35 per cent to 700,000 tonnes, signalling the revenue generation scenario remaining feeble for domestic producers.”
Though the balance sheet of both, Tata and JSW, look heavy, brokerages feel the two are in a good position to service their debts. “Both have been able to sell whatever they produce. Due to this, JSW as well as Tata Steel have no cash flow issues and are still cash-positive despite the challenging business environment,” said an analyst with a local brokerage. “Also, cost of production for Tata Steel is economical due to captive iron ore and to that extent, there is no alarming situation. Though the balance sheets are stretched for Tata Steel and JSW, they are not bankrupt.”
Tata Steel continues to be in a position to service its debt. At JSW, profitability is not an issue despite the dependence on e-auctioned and imported ore which bloats the expenditure bill.
Most analysts said the two companies have kept the capacity to sail through the current tough business environment and that the problem in the sector is more for smaller entities such as Bhushan Steel and Essar Steel, unable to service their debt.
“The extent of fall that has happened in steel prices, globally as well as domestically, was not predictable. Even the surplus position that China is into and the price crash that has happened there could not be predicted,” said Giriraj Daga, portfolio manager at SKS Capital & Research. “Despite that, both Tata Steel and JSW are not making cash losses. They will continue to float.”
Meanwhile, the brokerages maintain a cautious stance on the metals sector as demand recovery remains elusive, oversupply from China continues and a global price fall is not over. “Balance sheets would likely remain stretched and return ratios dismal despite pruning of capital expenditure. We continue to prefer JSW Steel over Tata Steel,” said Centrum Brokerage.
Tata Steel was not reachable for comment, while JSW refused to comment ahead of its April-June earnings announcement, slated for July 29.