Vodafone wins arbitration case against govt in $2 bn tax dispute case

In April 2014, Vodafone initiated arbitration proceedings against India.
Vodafone Group Plc has won an international arbitration case against the Indian government in a $2 billion tax dispute, two sources with direct knowledge of the matter said.

An international arbitration tribunal in The Hague ruled that India’s imposition of a tax liability on Vodafone, as well as interest and penalties, were in a breach of an investment treaty agreement between India and the Netherlands, one of the sources said.

The tribunal, in its ruling, said the government must cease seeking the dues from Vodafone and should also pay 4.3 million pounds ($5.47 million) to the company as partial compensation for its legal costs, the source said.

Vodafone and India’s finance ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The tax dispute stems from Vodafone’s acquisition of the Indian mobile assets from Hutchison Whampoa in 2007. The government said Vodafone was liable to pay taxes on the acquisition, which the company contested.

In 2012, India’s top court ruled in favour of the telecom provider but the government later that year changed the rules to enable it to tax deals that had already been concluded.

In April 2014, Vodafone initiated arbitration proceedings against India.

India is entangled in more than a dozen international arbitration cases against companies, including Cairn Energy, over retrospective tax claims and cancellation of contracts. The exchequer could end up paying billions of dollars in damages if it loses.

RAP FOR RETRO
A timeline of the Vodafone tax battle

2007: Vodafone buys Hutchison’s India assets
Sep: Gets tax notice for not deducting tax at source
Oct: Challenges notice in Bombay HC

2008 
Dec: Bombay HC dismisses petition, allows tax dept to proceed on showcause notice

 
2010 
May: Tax dept passes order claiming jurisdiction to tax the transaction
June: Vodafone challenges the order through writ petition in Bombay HC (dismissed in September).
Sep: Vodafone moves SC against the HC decision
Nov: Asked to deposit Rs 2,500 cr with SC and provide a guarantee for Rs 8,500 cr
 
2011 
Mar: Vodafone receives a notice asking why it should not be liable for penalties of up to 100%
Apr: SC stays tax dept from enforcing any penalty
 
2012 
Jan: SC says I-T can’t levy tax on the deal
Mar: Retro amendments allow govt to tax such deals
Apr 16: Vodafone issues notice to govt, initiating arbitration for not protecting investor rights
 
2013
Jan 3: Vodafone received Rs 14,200-crore tax demand (principal and interest, not penalties)
May: Law Minister Kapil Sibal approves a settlement of the tax dispute through conciliation
Jun 4: Cabinet approves non-binding conciliation
Dec 31: Vodafone responds to the govt's conciliation offer
 
2014
Jan: Vodafone challenges the demand under the Netherlands-India Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT)
Apr 17: Vodafone serves an arbitration notice under the India-Netherlands Bilateral Investment Protection Agreement (BIPA), after I-T department withdraws conciliation offer without waiting for a tribunal's decision in the transfer pricing case
 
2016
Feb 12: Vodafone receives a Rs 22,100-crore tax demand (including interest from the date of the first demand)
 
2017
Jan: Vodafone serves a second arbitration notice — this one under the India-UK BIT
Aug 22: The Delhi High Court restrains Vodafone from participating in the second arbitration
Dec 14: The Supreme Court allows Vodafone to initiate the second arbitration process
 
2018
May 7: The Delhi HC refuses to restrict Vodafone from pursuing simultaneous arbitrations before two different tribunals on the same dispute
 
2020
Sep 25: Vodafone is reported to have won the arbitration case. The international tribunal in The Hague is quote as having ruled India’s imposition of tax liability on Vodafone, as well as interest and penalties, in a breach of the India-Netherlands BIPA


Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Business Standard is now on Telegram.
For insightful reports and views on business, markets, politics and other issues, subscribe to our official Telegram channel