What the British
were thinking when they introduced Section 377
of the Indian Penal Code
might never truly be known. They probably did not expect this law to outlast their rule in India by over 70 years.
The Victorian-era law, which was written in 1860 and which criminalises “unnatural” sexual acts, continued to stand strong despite several legal attempts to strike it down. But at last, it has changed.
Navtej Singh Johar, a Sangeet Natak Akademi award-winning Bharatanatyam dancer
and yoga teacher, petitioned the Supreme Court with four other private citizens to decriminalise homosexuality
and protect the rights of the LGBTQ community
under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which pertains to the right of life.
His co-petitioners were journalist Sunil Mehra, restaurateur Ritu Dalmia, architectural restorer and hotelier Aman Nath, and marketing professional Ayesha Kapur.
The most striking departure from previous legal battles against Section 377
was that this petition was the first to be filed by private citizens who have come together only as members of the LGBTQ community
and not as part of any specific organisation.
“I am making this petition because as a normal gay man, who considers himself to be a responsible and a worthwhile citizen of this country, 377 makes no sense. My orientation is different, that is all, and that is no crime,” Johar had said to this reporter over email.
Each of the petitioners wields significant social capital, and yet, as their petition stated, they “find their lives inexorably constricted and their rights infringed” by Section 377.
“Despite their formidable achievements and contribution to India, they are denied the right to sexuality, the most basic and inherent of fundamental rights. Section 377
of the IPC renders them criminals in their own country,” the petition read.
Johar, who is in his mid-50s, is a popular face in Delhi’s culture circuit and lives with his partner, Mehra, in Green Park.
The petition, a result of common interests coming together, was filed in April 2016. This was parallel to the February 2016 curative petition by Naz Foundation that was ordered by the Supreme Court to be heard in front of a Constitutional bench.
The legal team for the five private citizens was led by Menaka Guruswamy, Saurabh Kirpal, Arundhati Katju, Neeha Nagpal and Pritha Srikumar. Senior lawyers such as Kapil Sibal had appeared for the case.
A Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra
and justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud heard the case on January 8 this year.
An order was issued to debate the merits of this writ petition before a relevant bench. Johar’s petition was then heard in July before a bench of CJI Dipak Misra, Justices Rohinton F Nariman, D Y Chandrachud, A M Khanwilkar and Indu Malhotra.
More than the case itself, it was a matter of preserving the LGBTQ community’s dignity. “It was the 2013 Supreme Court judgment that said that homosexuals are a minuscule minority in India and that this law does not really affect anyone personally,” said Johar.
“It was precisely this that made many of us want to step forward and put a face to this minority, which is not minuscule. And even if it is, the minority counts within a democracy. The reality is that 377 compromises the freedom and affects many of us adversely,” he added.
“Shedding this moralistic, Western attitude towards alternative sexuality would be like flicking the last straw out of our psyches. It would really mean decolonising our minds,” Johar had said.