He had been exempt from appearing before Westminster Magistrates' Court for case management hearings by Chief Magistrate Emma Louise Arbuthnot before his trial begins on December 4.
However, his legal team had indicated to the court that Mallya, wanted in India over a default on loans worth around Rs 9,000 crores to his now-defunct Kingfisher Airlines, likes to be present at the hearings.
"All matters are on track," official sources had confirmed to PTI in reference to the timeline set by the court for the Indian authorities- represented by the UK's Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) - to provideMallya's defence team with adetailed opening note on the case.
The defence response from Mallya's legal team on the paperwork was to have been completed this week.
The CPS, arguing on behalf of the Indian government at the last hearing on July 6, had told the court that they had "excellent cooperation" with the Indian authorities in the case and had sufficient material to establish a prima facie case forthe extradition of the UB Group chief.
"We havecompleted a review of materialsand I am happy to state that we have hadexcellent cooperation with the Indian authorities in this case. We are ready and willing to proceedand would invite the court to fix a hearing date at the earliest," CPS barrister Mark Summers had said.
The judgeagreed with the CPS to "progress with some rigour" and set December 4 as the start date for a final hearing in the case.
If the Chief Magistrate rules in favour of extradition at the end of the trial, the UKhome secretary must order Mallya's extradition within two months of the appropriate day.
However, the case can go through a series of appeals before arriving at a conclusion.
India and the UK have an Extradition Treaty, signed in 1992 and in force since November 1993,under which recently a Bangladeshi national
wanted in the UK on murder charges was to be extradited from India.
MohammadAbdulShakur is accused of murdering his wife Juli Begum and two daughters in the UK in 2007 before fleeing the country. He was arrested in Assam and his repatriation to the UK was delayed due to an ongoing court case in New Delhi.
Another extradition request under the treaty involved Ashok Malik, which was withdrawn by the Indian authorities last month after Malik offered to return to face the Indian justice system voluntarily.
Malik, the exact charges against whom are not known, was expected to appear at a hearing in a Delhi court this week.
So far only one successful extradition has taken place from the UK to India under the treaty - that of Samirbhai Vinubhai Patel, who was sent back to India last October to face trial in connection with his involvement in the post- Godhra riots of 2002.
According to the last government statement in the Rajya Sabha, the other Indian extradition requests pending with the UK include fugitives Rajesh Kapoor, Tiger Hanif, Atul Singh, Raj Kumar Patel, Jatinder Kumar Angurala, Asha Rani Angurala, Sanjeev Kumar Chawla and Shaik Sadiq.