The same issue is pending before various other courts. Even the constitutional validity of these provisions of the GST
is being challenged.
Abhishek Rastogi, partner with Khaitan & Co, said: “The matters are pending before various courts to determine the constitutional validity of the provision per se because the Indian importer is not the service receiver at all.”
Statutory provisions say the service provider is liable to pay without appreciating that the importer in these cases is not the service receiver, he said.
is different from free on board. While sellers assume responsibilities till goods are shipped to a particular destination or buyer, they are not responsible once the goods are shipped.
The Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR), Uttarakhand, has ruled that the importer will have to pay the integrated GST (IGST) on cost, insurance and freight value and also on the ocean freight component
The issue before the AAR was whether the importer will have to pay the IGST on freight value, on the reverse charge mechanism (RCM), when the service provider and service recipient are outside India
Generally, the service provider has to submit the GST to the government, but under the RCM the buyer will have to do it