But even before the NAA order, the complainant had requested for withdrawal of application, citing inadequate understanding of GST provision at the time of filing the complaint in September last year. But the authority considered the investigative report of the Directorate General of Safeguard (DGS) before dismissing the petition.
“In respect of the two invoices date July 27, 2017, as the installation of the second lift had been completed after coming into force of the CGST Act, 2017, he was liable to be charged GST at the rate prevalent on July 27, 2017,” the NAA order delivered by three members of the authority, including chairman BN Sharma, said.
The anti-profiteering mechanism is a three-stage process: A state-level screening committee for local complaints and a standing committee for national-level complaints; investigation by the Directorate General of Safeguards, and a probe by the NAA.
“The NAAis trying to understand the business. Pricing doesn’t depend only on rates. They have been selective and methodical in approach,” said Pratik Jain, national leader, indirect tax, PwC India.
The NAA is currently looking into 50 complaints and will issue the orders in the coming weeks.
The authority also dismissed charges against Basmati
rice-exporting firm KRBL for not passing on price reduction benefits under GST. Before that, it had dismissed the complaint against Vrandavaneshwaree Automotive, a Bareilly-based Honda car dealer, by concluding that it did not contravene the anti-profiteering provisions of the CGST Act.
Rajat Mohan, partner, AMRG & Associates, said the journey has so far been smooth for the industry. “After more than 300 days of implementation, the NAA has passed only two orders, both of which were in favour of industry,” he said.
The NAA is chaired by BN Sharma and is assisted by four senior officials of the rank of joint secretary and above.