However, the moot point is that economic growth
saw disruptions due to demonetisation
and implementation of the GST.
While the impact of demonetisation
has faded, experts believe that some of the GST
effects are still lingering such as on exporters who have been struggling to get refunds. Merchandise exports did not contract in any month of 2017-18, except for October. However, the growth
has been coming down since its strong surge of 30.55 per cent in November 2017 and stood at just 4.4 per cent in February, due to the issue of refunds.
“In many ways, 2017-18 was a defining year for the Indian economy.
India completely reset its indirect tax system to a comprehensive GST
while still experiencing the impact of the demonetisation
shock of November 2016,” says Anis Chakravarty, partner and lead economist, Deloitte India.
He says that the rise in GDP growth
from the second quarter of 2017-18 suggests that the initial negative impact of the GST
may be waning.
UPA v/s NDA: Qualitative difference
However, if one goes into comparison between where UPA had left the economic growth
and the NDA’s performance, it does seem that GDP
expansion in 2017-18 is officially estimated to be just 0.2 percentage point higher than 6.4 per cent handed down by the Manmohan Singh government in 2013-14, a period ridiculed for its so-called “policy paralysis”.
In between, the NDA did push the growth
upwards to 7.4 per cent in 2014-15 and then to 8.2 per cent in 2015-16.
Bibek Debroy, chairman of the economic advisory council to the Prime Minister, however, feels that growth
achieved by the UPA was due to fiscal profligacy.
“The question is not what growth
rate has been delivered, but about fiscal consequences of that growth.
The question about the UPA growth
was not about the growth
figure, but about the way that growth
happened,” says Debroy.
So far, as fiscal deficit is concerned, the NDA paused on fiscal deficit target thrice. The Budget Estimates of reining in fiscal deficit at 3.2 per cent of GDP
was revised upwards to 3.5 per cent for 2017-18. Even the revised target seems difficult to achieve unless expenditure was squeezed. The fiscal deficit figure for the April to February period 2017-18 (11 months) was 20.3 per cent higher than revised estimate for the entire fiscal year.
The parameter on which the NDA government succeeded remarkably is inflation. This may also be due to Monetary Policy Committee, which has been given the mandate to contain consumer price index-based inflation between 2 per cent and 6 per cent. If the average inflation breaches this range in any three consecutive quarters, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) will have to explain the reasons to the government.
Inflation never breached this range in 2017-18, except for the month of June. That time, inflation was outside the lower range and stood at 1.46 per cent, initially leading to worries over low inflation.
Exact contrast to this, inflation exceeded 4 per cent for the fourth month in a row till February. However, inflation has been coming down from the high of 5.21 per cent in November and stood at 4.44 per cent in February.
Major risks to the economy
may come from oil prices and growing tendency of protectionism around the world, triggered by US’s so-called reciprocal taxes. However, domestic factors, including from adjustments to the GST, would play a greater role. “Major external risks include oil price shocks, tax rate competitiveness, and growing barriers to trade. However, the Indian economy
remains predominantly a domestically-driven one, so the major downside risks will be domestic in nature, such as continuing disruptions from the implementation of the GST,” Chakravarty says.