Since the crash of the GST
system on February 1, when 480,000 bills were uploaded, the infrastructure has been upgraded. It has also gone through three rounds of testing for its load-bearing capacity.
A group of ministers (GoM), led by Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Sushil Kumar Modi, to fix issues with the GST portal has claimed that 2.6 million e-way bills will be generated daily. This will eventually rise to 5 million. The system is equipped to process 7.5 million bills per day.
After the meeting on Saturday, Finance Minister Aurn Jaitley said the states would be divided into four groups for the e-way bill for intra-state movement which will be introduced in phases in each group, with intervals of a week. He added an effort was being made to complete the roll-out in April. A statement from the finance ministry said the process would be completed no later than June 1.
States ready for the e-way bill, Karnataka, Kerala, and Uttar Pradesh, were likely to be in the first group, said a source. Kerala Finance Minister Thomas Isaac said tax evasion was the biggest challenge for the GST system, and the e-way bill could solve it.
Experts concurred with this. Vishal Raheja, GST expert with Taxmann, said, “The decision to roll out the e-way bill will certainly curb tax evasion and boost collections from the new financial year.”
The Council could not reach consensus on the simplification of GST returns. The GoM had given the Council its views on various options, suggested by Infosys Chairman Nandan Nilekani and others.
Jaitley said the GoM would improve on the suggestions and ensure that the final model eradicated evasion. Tax officials at both the Centre and the states have raised concerns over this.
The existing process of filing supply returns (GSTR1) and summary input-output returns (GSTR3B) will continue for three more months. These were supposed to be replaced by end-March with one form, which could be filed instead of three.
Nilekani had suggested a mechanism involving the seller uploading invoices and the buyer acknowledging them. The buyer would receive credit for tax paid on inputs. No credit would be paid for missing invoices.
The other option is to provide provisional credit to buyers in case an invoice is not uploaded by a seller. However, if a seller disputes the transaction, the credit to the buyer will be reversed.
There is also the model that was used for filing returns under the value-added tax regime. Kerala Finance Minister Isaac said the Council had considered putting the three models together.
Without a new tax filing process, the reverse-charge mechanism is also going to be delayed by three months.
Experts said with this delay, the uncertainty would continue. They are also of the opinion that the reverse-charge mechanism should be scrapped.
“The uncertainty over filing GST returns will continue for three more months it seems,” said Saloni Roy, senior director, Deloitte India.
Abhishek Rastogi, partner, Khaitan & Co, said the Council seems to want to wait and watch a little longer. He added that the reverse-charge mechanism should be done away with.