The Council, chaired by Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, will also weigh options of raising the government’s stake in the IT body to 51 per cent from the current 49 per cent. Earlier this month, Finance Secretary Hasmukh Adhia was asked by Jaitley to review whether this was possible.
“A few states have been demanding that GSTN be a government-owned body. With Facebook data leak to Cambridge Analytica, the national security argument is gaining ground now,” said another government official.
Currently, five private institutions — HDFC, HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, NSE Strategic Investment Co and LIC Housing Finance — hold a combined stake of 51 per cent in GSTN, which was incorporated on March 28, 2013. The Centre and respective states hold 24.5 per cent each.
Once the Council gives approval, the Union Cabinet will take up the proposal.
“Discussions on converting GSTN into a government body, per se, should not affect its functioning so long as it continues to be professionally managed,” said Pratik Jain, partner, PwC India.
GSTN Chief Executive Officer Prakash Kumar told Business Standard in an interview that ‘hiring and firing’ was faster here because it was a private company and the private sector salary structure helped it hire the right set of people.
Allaying concerns on information lapses, he stressed confidentiality was embedded in the GSTN structure. “No single person has complete information of a taxpayer. One has registration data, the other has returns data etc. So it will require three persons to collude to get the full data of a taxpayer. Even I cannot see the details of an individual taxpayer,” he had said.
A Group of Ministers, led by Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Sushil Modi, had failed to reach a consensus on simplifying GST
return forms in its meeting last week. They would submit a draft with three options for the Council to discuss.
One of the options, as recommended by Infosys Chairman Nandan Nilekani, requires the seller to upload all invoices, which the buyer must acknowledge. Based on this, the buyer would get credit for taxes paid on inputs. No credit would be available if the buyer claims that some invoices are missing.
The other model requires a seller to upload invoices and moots provisional credit even if the invoice has not been uploaded. However, if a seller disputes a particular transaction, credit will be reversed at a later stage.
The third model is likely to be a combination of the first two.
“With respect to simplification, the issue pertains to providing provisional input tax to taxpayers, and whether it should be linked to tax payments made or not will be discussed,” said another government official.
“If the Council takes a decision on May 1, it could possibly be introduced in the last quarter of this year. While three monthly returns may be combined into one, I expect the principle of invoice matching to continue,” added Jain.
In addition, the Council is expected to provide clarity in the recent AAR judgment that stated outlets at Delhi International Airport were not ‘free from duties’ under the new indirect tax regime.
In the previous indirect tax regime — prior to the July 1 GST roll out — duty-free shops were exempt from the central sales tax and value-added tax as sale from such shops was considered exports and supplies were taking place beyond customs jurisdictions.
Jain said the recent advance ruling that the GST would be applicable to airport duty-free shops at departure terminals came as a surprise as it was not in line with the earlier practice as well as global VAT regimes.
The ruling was in response to an application filed by Rod Retail Private Limited, which runs a retail outlet at Terminal 3 (International Departure) of Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi.