Last-minute change led to decision of cryptocurrency ban by govt panel

Photo: Reuters
The central government was initially in favour of “regulating” cryptocurrencies instead of imposing a blanket ban on them before it had a change of heart due to objections from various regulators, the record of discussions of the high-level committee, which released its recommendations on Tuesday, showed.

 

During deliberations, Economic Affairs Secretary Subhash Chandra Garg, who was chairing the inter-ministerial committee, pressed for “accepting virtual currencies as an economic phenomenon” and was not in favour of a ban initially, arguing that “regulating it will likely lead to better results”.

 

In fact, in the first meeting of the committee, which was held on November 27, 2017, the committee had broadly agreed that “the banning option is difficult to implement”. “It may also drive some operators underground, which may encourage use of such ‘currencies’ for illegitimate purposes,” minutes of the meeting showed.

 

The committee initially wanted to focus on determining the nature of cryptocurrencies and whether it needed to be classified as commodities or financial assets.

 

However, in the second meeting of the committee held on February 22, 2018, the regulators pressed for imposing a complete ban on cryptocurrencies, such as bitcoins. This meeting took place after Finance Minister Arun Jaitley presented the Union Budget for 2018-19 in which he emphasised that the government does not consider virtual currencies as legal tender “and will take all measures to eliminate use of these crypto-assets.”

 

RBI Deputy Governor BP Kanungo and then Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) Chairman Sushil Chandra voiced their opinions favouring a ban on cryptocurrencies. Chandra said it creates “a chain of black money.” “He also mentioned that recent search i.e. conducted in exchanges dealing with virtual currencies had revealed that most uninformed people in interior places are being lured to buy it.”

 

However, Garg was still not convinced. He said the matter related to cryptocurrencies was supposed to be taken up in the G-20 meeting, which was supposed to be held soon during that time. He cited the example of South Korea which had to roll back their decision to ban cryptocurrencies.

 

“Secretary (EA) said that the option of banning can be looked afresh and asked RBI and CBDT to prepare draft law which might be needed to be prepared in case banning option is accepted,” the document said. He suggested that using cryptocurrencies in payment systems may be banned but not in its entirety “considering the nature of technology.”

Garg was supported by Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology secretary Ajay Prakash Sawhney in his view who felt that India, “being in the forefront of technological innovation”, should have an open attitude towards cryptocurrencies.

The meeting ended with conclusions to form two sets of papers – one on banning and the other on regulating cryptocurrencies.

However, in the concluding meeting of the committee held in a gap of almost a year – on 9 January 2019 – the committee agreed upon a draft law imposing a complete ban on cryptocurrencies which “took into account the global developments and interaction” with stakeholders such as the International Monetary Fund, among others.



Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Business Standard is now on Telegram.
For insightful reports and views on business, markets, politics and other issues, subscribe to our official Telegram channel