The order was challenged by REC generating companies in the Supreme Court and in Appellate Tribunal of Electricity (APTEL). The petitioners had submitted that lowering the prices would never clear the unsold stock of close to 10 million RECs.
The generators asked the APTEL to suggest means to clear the existing stock of RECs which would be hampered by the new price regime. The Supreme Court, in a separate case, however, allowed the trading of non-solar RECs with the earlier prices. APTEL is yet to give a decision in the matter which has led to backlog of RECs.
The non-solar ones where the trading was allowed in the last four months saw good trading. In the past four months, the non-solar RECs traded were 1.2 to 5.2 million. The last tranche of 3.9 million will be trading next week, which would be cleared in one go, said a market expert.
"There was an overall improvement in the renewable purchase obligation (RPO) which led to turnaround in the non-solar RECs. After more than five years, demand of RECs exceeded supply However, due to huge backlog, RECs were sold at the floor price,” said a trader. Against a demand of 14 million RECs, there were 4.8 million non-solar RECs.
With no clarity on solar RECs and non-solar ones too going off market, purchasers and sellers of these certificates, like distribution companies, thermal power producers, open access consumers, would have to look at alternate mechanism to meet RPO.
Sector experts said thermal captive industry of 65 Gw would need close to 20 million RECs while open access consumers would need 7.5 million RECs annually. There is also 272 Gw of thermal power capacity which needs to meet RPO.
“The existing 32 Gw of wind power capacity cannot meet requirement of REC demand of 337 Gw. There will be immense shortfall in the coming years,” said a renewable power expert.
He added the demand from these consumers would continue as they do not have access to power procured by SECI.