Traders' bodies divided on call for Bharat bandh over GST provisions

Topics GST law | Traders | India trade

Representational image

Traders' bodies were divided on the Bharat bandh call on February 26 against provisions of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) as a national-level organisation of small businessmen on Friday said it is opposed to the move.

A traders' body of West Bengal also said that it is not supporting the bandh call.

The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) on Thursday said all commercial markets across the country will remain closed on February 26 in view of its Bharat bandh call demanding a review of the provisions of the GST regime.

Jayendra Tanna, national president of Federation of All India Vyapar Mandal (FAIVM), said, "We are against any kind of Bharat bandh or shop bandh or Chakka Jam."

CAIT Secretary-General Praveen Khandelwal on Thursday said in New Delhi that the All India Transporters Welfare Association supports the Bharat Bandh call and will hold a Chakka Jam on February 26.

The FAIVM said it is engaged with around 4 crore traders across 400 districts of the country for a new GST law campaign in consultation with all stakeholders.

"We will submit a memorandum to the central government on February 22 with a request from traders and retailers to rewrite the entire GST law which should be simple, user- friendly and easy to understand to implement and comply by all sections of traders and retailers," FAIVM secretary V K Bansal said.

The Confederation of West Bengal Traders Associations president Sushil Poddar also said that it is not supporting the bandh call and will remain operational on February 26.

The CAIT said dharnas (protests) will be held nationwide in 1,500 places demanding the Centre, state governments and the GST Council to keep in abeyance the "draconian" provisions of GST.

Khandelwal said that almost 950 amendments have been made so far to GST rules in the past four years and issues related to glitches in the GST portal and the continuous increase in compliance burden are the major lacunae in the tax regime.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Business Standard is now on Telegram.
For insightful reports and views on business, markets, politics and other issues, subscribe to our official Telegram channel