"We have nothing to do with the elections," the bench said, adding, "Any case that we decide, prejudices one side or the other. Going by your logic, we would not be able to decide any case."
The Centre and the Chhattisgarh government said there was nothing emergent in the matter and it should be heard after the assembly polls.
"We are not concerned with the elections," the bench said.
The court said it would hear arguments on behalf of the petitioners, and the Centre and state can respond to it later.
The counsel appearing for the petitioners made it clear that they were not against any political party and that they had approached the court for protection of human rights of the tribals.
He told the court their main challenge was against deployment of erstwhile SPOs as 'auxiliary armed force' in the state.
The counsel said the apex court had in 2011 declared as "illegal and unconstitutional" the deployment of tribals as SPOs in anti-naxal operations, but the state came out with the Chhattisgarh Auxiliary Armed Police Force Act, through which the erstwhile SPOs were engaged as auxiliary force.
He argued that there were instances of "lawless violence" in certain areas of the state and some of the members engaged as erstwhile SPOs were allegedly involved in a 2011 incident where three villages were set on fire and women were raped.
"The SPOs against whom complaints are pending should be prosecuted," the counsel said, adding that its members had also attacked the CBI team which had gone to Chhattisgarh to conduct a probe as per the directions of the top court.
"SPOs, who have been put in this (auxiliary) force, have run amok and even the state cannot control them," the lawyer said, adding several cases against them were closed by the police.
The arguments remained inconclusive and would continue on November 27.
Salwa Judum, an anti-Maoist civil militia, was disarmed and disbanded in 2011 in the state following the apex court's order declaring as illegal and unconstitutional the deployment of tribal youths as SPOs in the fight against Maoist insurgency.
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.