Tianfu has flourished because of Xi’s personal endorsement. In 2018, he visited Chengdu and remarked that its development should “highlight the characteristics of a park city.” Local cadres quickly added “park city” to its official name and put up street banners proclaiming its “park city” status. A Park City Research Institute was established to help the project become “a globally famous and successful model” for urbanization.
Tianfu’s artificial lakes and green spaces cover more than half the city. Bloomberg
Wu Changhua, senior researcher at Beijing-based think tank Center for China and Globalization, said China’s policies show the top leadership is determined to restore the environment, but that’s not always what motivates local bureaucrats. “A deeper driver could be lush subsidies and stimulus for economic growth,” she said.
Of the hundreds of projects classified as “eco-city” developments, many don’t employ sustainable strategies such as energy efficient buildings, smart traffic layouts and renewable energy, said Deng Wu, an associate professor at the Department of Architecture and Built Environment
at the University of Nottingham Ningbo China.
Developers often advertise their buildings as “eco-friendly” because they maintain stable temperature, humidity and oxygen levels indoors, but achieving that actually requires consuming large amounts of power, he said. “They equate ‘eco-friendly’ to being comfortable, but these projects have nothing to do with being eco-friendly, and can even have the opposite effect.”
To many residents, the beautiful landscaping and modern buildings in Tianfu embody the “eco city” ethos, and are a huge improvement from the poorly built cities of the past. In their view, clean air, water and streets are more important barometers of “eco-civilization” than buildings that conserve energy.
But cities need businesses and jobs to grow, not just pretty parks. In Tianfu’s central business district, some local companies lured by government subsidies and tax breaks have moved into the new skyscrapers, though the area is far from bustling. Global chains like Starbucks Corp. and Pizza Hut Inc. have opened outlets on the waterfront, where property agents hawk apartments to pedestrians, talking up the government’s investment in the area.
It’s too early to say if Tianfu will attract enough residents, said MIT’s Zheng. “There could be far more supply than demand if people don’t feel the need to move to a newly built city, especially where the existing city is not fully used yet,” she said, referring to Chengdu, which in recent years has become a popular destination for young people escaping high rents in places like Beijing and Shanghai.
It’s a story that’s played out in China before. Tianjin’s Binhai New City, along the east coast, was envisioned as a new financial powerhouse when former Premier Wen Jiabao launched the project more than 10 years ago. In 2019, only 100,000 people lived and worked in the Sino-Singapore Eco City, Binhai’s flagship project, far short of the government’s goal of having 350,000 permanent residents by 2020.
Fifteen minutes’ drive down a newly built highway leading out of Tianfu, residents of Hongxiang village played mahjong on a Sunday afternoon in July, chatting about the metropolis rising nearby. Surrounded by paddy fields and bamboo forests, they wondered when their village would be demolished to make room for Tianfu and whether they would be compensated for relinquishing homes that have been passed down for generations. A 67-year-old farmer, who gave her last name as Zhou, worried that she wouldn’t be eligible for a pension or health care in the city, even though she would have lost her only means of support.
Wang Xuelian, a 33-year-old mother of two, was puzzled by the whole notion of an eco-city. “Every day when I open my window I get to see nature. I don’t know why they want to demolish it to build some fake greenness,” she said.
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.