Last year, China’s modest 7.6 per cent defence spending
hike was considered an aberration, after years of double-digit rises. China had increased military spending by 10.1 per cent in 2015, 12.2 per cent in 2014 and 10.7 per cent in 2013.
Defence analysts assess that China’s actual defence spending
is 25-50 per cent higher than the official figure, which excludes what China spends on its nuclear and missile arsenal (called the 2nd Artillery Corps, or the Rocket Force), on research and development and large components of the defence industry.
On Saturday, on the eve of the fifth session of the 12th National People's Congress, a spokesperson stated that defence spending
would account for 1.3 per cent of China’s gross domestic product (GDP).
Compared to China’s defence spending
of 1.9 per cent of GDP in 2015-16 (including a 50 per cent corrective to the official figure), the US spent 3.3 per cent; Japan, 1 per cent; India, 2.3 per cent, and Pakistan, 3.4 per cent of its GDP on defence, according to the well regarded Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
(SIPRI), which tracks defence spending
China’s defence budget must spend on a major force restructuring announced by the People’s Liberation Army
(PLA) last year. This will replace its region-based, single-service commands with leaner, operationally structured tri-service force structures.
While China’s army demobilises 300,000 soldiers, the PLA (Navy) --- already the largest consumer of the defence budget --- will receive an increased allocation as it muscles up to enforce China’s claims in the South and East China Seas.
The PLA(N) is believed to be completing its second aircraft carrier, and navy-linked analysts in Beijing have stated that China would eventually field 5-6 carriers. Those, supplemented by a rapidly growing submarine fleet, would deter US aircraft carrier battle groups operating near China’s coastline.
The officially-endorsed Chinese newspaper, Global Times, quotes Song Zhongping, a Beijing-based military expert as stating: “As [the PLA] aims to cut 300,000 jobs by the end of 2017, some personnel and maintenance fees can be saved so that the money can be used to establish other arms of the military. From this perspective, a 7 per cent increase is sufficient”.
China’s spending restraint ignores sabre-rattling from Washington, where President Donald Trump
told the United States Congress last week that he would push for an defence spending
hike of $54 billion rise in 2017 --- a rise equal to one-third of China’s official defence budget.
On February 17, Trump announced at a Boeing
aircraft facility: “The best way to prevent war is being prepared. Peace through strength. We [will] build a military might so great --- and we are going to do that --- that none will dare to challenge it.”
Yet, Trump faces sharp criticism at home by defence hawks like Senator John McCain for an inadequate response to the China threat. McCain says the $54 billion increase is insufficient to pay for the US Navy’s planned build up from 274 ships to 350, or for recapitalising an air force that needs to buy the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter in large numbers.
To free up more money, Trump has pushed member-countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), which he has accused of “free riding” on US military capabilities, to raise their defence spending
to the 2 per cent of GDP that the treaty mandates. Currently, only the United Kingdom spends near that level.
In Beijing today, the 12th National People’s Congress spokesperson pointed to Trump’s NATO
demand and asked: “You should ask them what their intentions are.”
Beijing’s planned 7 per cent defence spending
hike in 2017 is broadly in step with the 6.7 per cent increase in the Chinese economy last year, which was announced on Thursday.
Economists at JP Morgan
expect that Beijing will keep the growth target for this year unchanged at between 6.5 per cent and 7 per cent. Others at investment banking group UBS
predicted that the growth target will be set at around 6.5 per cent, according to a statement on Thursday.