The Sriwijaya flight, with a 26-year-old Boeing Co. 737-500 jet, took off from Jakarta with 62 people on Jan. 9 and at first flew what appeared to be a routine trajectory, according to a flight track produced by Flightradar24. After reaching about 10,000 feet (3,050 meters), it leveled off, staying between 10,000 and 11,000 feet for about 45 seconds, according to the data.
At around that time, an air-traffic controller radioed the plane to say it was off course, said Transportation Minister Budi Karya Sumadi. There was no response. At roughly the same time, the plane turned left by about 40 degrees in the opposite direction from which it had been directed.
At that point, the jetliner began an abrupt descent.
It dropped by close to 10,000 feet in roughly 14 seconds, which would mean it was descending at about 40,000 feet per minute. That far exceeds any kind of normal flight activity, even an emergency maneuver to get to lower altitudes.
Aviation safety analysts cautioned that it’s far too early to say what caused the crash. Numerous factors including some type of malfunction, pilot actions or even a suicide remain possible, they said. Indonesian Navy divers retrieved the flight data recorder on Tuesday and were seeking to get the cockpit voice recorder.
“I would not take anything off the table yet,” said John Cox, president of Safety Operating Systems and a former airline pilot. “We just don’t have the data.”
Here are several scenarios in which planes fell from the sky, which show similarities and differences with the Sriwijaya Air flight:
USAir Flight 427, Sept. 8, 1994
This was the second of two accidents attributed to a flaw in the 737’s rudder. All 132 people aboard died in the crash near Pittsburgh.
As the plane, a 737-300, approached for a landing at an altitude of about 6,000 feet, its rudder jammed to one side, the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board concluded. The plane rolled sharply to the left and its nose pointed down toward the ground.
The aircraft in the Indonesia
accident was in the same family of 737 jets, but the two accidents seem unlikely to be related, said Jeffrey Guzzetti, former chief accident investigator with the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration.
Several years after the accident, the FAA mandated a rudder fix for all 737s. There hasn’t been an accident blamed on the system since.
Furthermore, the issues identified in the Pittsburgh crash and an earlier one in Colorado were limited to a narrow speed band, and the Sriwijaya Air plane was flying too fast for it to fall prey to the same loss of control, Guzzetti said.
Air France Flight 447, June 1, 2009
This Airbus SE A330 carrying 228 people from Brazil to France plunged into the Atlantic Ocean from a cruising altitude above 30,000 feet.
The instruments used to determine airspeed malfunctioned after ice formed on them and pilots became disoriented, climbing and allowing the plane to slow dangerously and enter an aerodynamic stall, French investigators found. All aboard died.
But it’s unlikely that ice would have formed on the Sriwijaya Air jet, which was flying at much lower altitudes.
The Air France aircraft also fell at a far slower rate than the Indonesian plane. The A330 jet was rocking side to side instead of diving and dropped at an average of about 11,000 feet per minute, according to the investigation. That’s several times slower than the Sriwijaya Air plane.
Atlas Air Flight Flight 3591, Feb. 23, 2019
As the cargo jet, a Boeing 767-300, approached Houston carrying packages for Amazon.com Inc., a copilot accidentally added engine power. Apparently disoriented and thinking the plane’s nose was dangerously high, he then pushed the plane into a steep dive, according to the NTSB.
The jet reached speeds of 500 miles (805 kilometers) per hour in seconds, smashing into a marsh in Trinity Bay and killing the three people aboard. The preliminary data in Indonesia
shows that plane was diving at roughly similar speeds.
It’s possible that disoriented pilots on the Sriwijaya Air plane made a similar mistake, Guzzetti said.
A Flydubai crash in Rostov-on-Don, Russia, on March 19, 2016, was the result of similar pilot disorientation as in the Atlas Air flight, prompting the 737-800 to plummet from an altitude of about 4,000 feet, according to Russia’s Air Accident Investigation Commission. All 62 people aboard died.
While the Flydubai plane involved different circumstances, it also shows how a flight crew can inadvertently trigger such a dangerous dive, Guzzetti said.
Hitting the wrong button in the cockpit can cause similar disorientation and unintended dives.
In September 2011, a Boeing 737-700 operated by Air Nippon Co., the predecessor to All Nippon Airways Co., nosedived by around 6,000 feet from a 41,000 feet cruising altitude after one of the pilots was suspected to have unintentionally operated the rudder trim control while trying to switch a cockpit door lock control to let the captain re-enter the flight deck. That didn’t result in any crash or any damage to the aircraft.
Silk Air Flight 185, Dec. 19, 1997
This 737-300 carrying 104 people mysteriously dove into a river in the area of Palembang, Indonesia, from 35,000 feet after both crash-proof recorders were disabled.
The U.S. NTSB, which had been assisting Indonesia’s National Transportation Safety Committee, concluded that the captain had intentionally downed the plane. Indonesian investigators said there wasn’t enough evidence to identify what happened.
The plane was diving so fast -- close to the speed of sound -- that it began breaking apart, according to investigators.
While cautioning that it’s far too early to suggest the Indonesia
crash was intentional, such a scenario at least has to be considered, said both Cox and Guzzetti.
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.