The FireEye breach was disclosed in a public filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission citing CEO Kevin Mandia. A blog post by the company https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2020/12/unauthorized-access-of-fireeye-red-team-tools.html said "red team tools" were stolen as part of a highly sophisticated, likely government-backed hacking operation that used previously unseen techniques.
It is not clear exactly when the hack initially took place, but a person familiar with the events said the company has been resetting user passwords over the past two weeks.
Beyond the tool theft, the hackers also appeared to be interested in a subset of FireEye customers: government agencies.
The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Adam Schiff, said he would ask for more information. "We have asked the relevant intelligence agencies to brief the Committee in the coming days about this attack, any vulnerabilities that may arise from it, and actions to mitigate the impacts."
There is no evidence that FireEye's hacking tools have been used or that client data was stolen. But the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Microsoft Corp are helping to look.
"The FBI is investigating the incident and preliminary indications show an actor with a high level of sophistication consistent with a nation state," said Matt Gorham, assistant FBI director for the Cyber Division.
A former Defense Department official familiar with the case said that Russia was high on the early list of suspects. In the run-up to the U.S. elections, where Russian interference was a prime concern, U.S. officials exposed some Russian hacking techniques.
Other security companies have been successfully hacked before, including Bit9, Kaspersky Lab and RSA, underscoring the difficulty in keeping anything digital away from the most sophisticated hackers.
"Plenty of similar companies have also been popped like this," said a Western security official who asked not to be named.
"The goal of these operations is typically to collect valuable intelligence that can help them defeat security countermeasures and enable hacking of organizations all over the world," said Dmitri Alperovitch, co-founder and former chief technology officer at top rival CrowdStrike.
FireEye disclosing what happened and which tools were taken is "helping to minimize the chances of others getting compromised as a result of this breach."
FireEye said it has been working to shore up defenses against its own tools with different software makers, and it released countermeasures publicly.
Those showed that the tools uses modified versions of public programs, said Vincent Liu, chief executive of security firm Bishop Fox and a former National Security Agency analyst.
The stolen computer kit targets a myriad of different vulnerabilities in popular software products. FireEye CEO Mandia wrote that none of the red team tools exploited so-called "zero-day vulnerabilities," meaning the relevant flaws should already be public.
Past hacking attacks on government agencies and contractors have captured such higher-value hacking tools, and some of those tools have been published, wrecking their effectiveness as defenses are put in place.
Both the NSA and CIA have been burned this way in the past decade, with Russia a key suspect. Russian and Iranian tools have been hacked and published more recently. Private surveillance software makers have also been targeted. Experts said it is hard to estimate the impact of a tool leak that focuses on known software vulnerabilities, but it could make attackers' jobs easier.
"Exploitation tools in the wrong hands will lead to more victimization of people who don't see it coming, and there's already enough problems like that," said Paul Ferguson, threat intelligence principal at security company Gigamon. "We don't really need more exploitation tools floating around making it easier - look at ransomware."
Whenever private companies learn of a vulnerability in their software products, they often offer a "patch" or upgrade that nullifies the issue. But many users do not install these patches at once, and some do not for months or longer.
(Reporting by Christopher Bing, Joseph Menn and Jack Stubbs; Editing by Lisa Shumaker and Stephen Coates)
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.