"If the government has concerns about specific parts of the withdrawal treaty, there are ready mechanisms within it to resolve them amicably; in the first instance by negotiation between the UK and the EU and, if that fails, through independent arbitration. It has chosen to ignore these options. Instead, it has thrown the withdrawal treaty into uncertainty and given the EU genuine reason to question whether Britain can be relied upon in any future trade agreements with the EU, they wrote.
Major was a Conservative prime minister from 1990 to 1997. His Labour successor Blair served as Britain's prime minister from 1997 to 2007.
Amid growing discord over the issue within his own party, Johnson has sought the backing of his MPs for the new Bill saying the EU is threatening to impose a customs border in the Irish Sea, separating Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK.
The Bill focuses on the Northern Ireland Protocol the part of the Brexit divorce designed to prevent a hard border on the island of Ireland. If it became law, it would give UK ministers powers to modify or "disapply" rules relating to the movement of goods between Britain and Northern Ireland that will come into force from January 2021, unless the UK and EU are able to strike a trade deal ahead of that.
UK Justice Secretary Robert Buckland described the proposed law as an insurance policy on Sunday, saying that he was prepared to resign if the UK ends up breaking the law over Brexit "in a way I find unacceptable".
He suggested that the government would only invoke the powers in the Bill if the EU acted in an "unreasonable" way by insisting on excessive checks on goods moving between the shared border of UK territory Northern Ireland and EU member-state Ireland.
"I believe with our determination to seek an agreement, we will get a position where we don't need to invoke these provisions. This is all about insurance planning, if you like, a break-the-glass-in-an-emergency provision," he said.
However, Irish Foreign Affairs minister Simon Coveney said it was "completely bogus" for the UK to claim that the EU was now interpreting the Withdrawal Agreement in a way which could lead to the break-up of the UK.
And, EU's Chief Brexit Negotiator Michel Barnier said the 27-member bloc could not have been "clearer" when the two sides agreed the Brexit withdrawal agreement last year what the implications would be for Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.
The issue has also piled pressure on the Goan-origin Attorney General in Johnson's Cabinet, Suella Braverman, who was challenged about the proposed law during the annual general meeting of the UK's Bar Council, the professional association for barristers, on Saturday.
According to The Observer', Braverman was asked how Britain could retain a shred of credibility in imploring other countries to follow international law after revealing its own willingness to breach agreements.
Five senior barristers reportedly confronted her during the meeting, telling her that a crime which broke the law in a specific and limited way the phrase used by Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis in the Commons when he announced the move was still a crime.
The issue is likely to dominate the political agenda as MPs return to Parliament next week to start debating the new Bill.
Labour's Brexit spokesperson, Rachel Reeves, has said the party could not support the bill "as it stands" because it would be "deliberately and consciously breaking international law". This coupled with opposition from within the ruling Conservatives has set the stage for the latest Commons clash over Brexit.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.