The report said “the gold-silver ratio can rally in the face of a crisis, although the nature of such a crisis would dictate how the ratio develops. If circumstances suggest that market instability increases, then investors generally would favour gold to silver.”
This, however, is not the only indicator for a looming crisis. In a recent report, The World Gold Council
had stated that global central banks buying more gold to add to their forex reserves was an indication that they were foreseeing a crisis and that required diversification of their reserves. Also, the gold at present is seen as the second-best as of now, next only to the US Dollar.
In 2018, global central banks added to their reserves 650 tonnes of gold, in their biggest annual addition since 1971, when the US had scrapped pegging gold to the dollar.
The Silver Institute report also highlighted several past instances when the ratio had gone above 80 before a big crisis hit the markets.
A good example is the 2008 global financial crisis, when the ratio had surged past 80, against a long-term average of around 65. On the other hand, at the end of April eight years ago, when the silver price had flirted with the $50-an-ounce level — its all-time high price — the ratio had fallen to 31.7. That had also been seen as an aberration by the market and the silver price had contracted sharply.
A high ratio in the early 1990s was in response to the Gulf War. “It is arguable that in anticipation of a crisis the market could see a ratio of above 80.” At the end of 2017, the gold-silver ratio stood at 77, a high level that perhaps signalled another major crisis was looming.
Indeed, the ratio again hit the 80s territories in February 2018, and moved sideways between 74 and 83 until September, when emerging markets
entered a phase of liquidity and investor confidence crisis.
This ratio had risen as high as 86 in the first week of December. Both the US equity markets
and the US dollar
declined sharply shortly afterwards