Close to 75 per cent of these assets is invested in large-caps, i.e. the top 100 firms by market capitalisation. About 17 per cent is invested in mid-caps (firms ranking 101-250) and only 6 per cent in small-caps (entities outside the top 250).
In the letter, Amfi
has underscored the challenges of investing in smaller stocks.
“It is pertinent to mention that several small-cap funds have periodically put restrictions on incremental or even SIP (systematic investment plans) flows, on account of the extreme illiquid nature of the market. While large-cap index funds have been growing, the industry has not been able to offer ETFs in mid- and small-cap indices, owing to the poor liquidity,” it has written.
added that the circular compels MFs to buy stocks in the broader universe at expensive valuations.
“The knowledge of compulsive buying by multi-cap funds could encourage market participants to hold on to illiquid stocks till the MFs come close to their target. These stocks could then crash once the artificial rush of MF purchase is over, because fundamentals will not support the prices. This, in turn, could adversely impact unit holders of the fund, as their money will be deployed at high prices,” the letter stated.
Amfi pointed out that while the intent of the circular was “laudable”, the proposed changes could have “unintended consequences”.
“We believe the standardisation of MF scheme categories to ensure truth in product labelling and avoid misleading names is a landmark reform introduced by Sebi.
In the letter, Amfi gave a few recommendations. The first was to rename the existing multi-cap fund category to “flexi-cap”, to allow dynamic allocation to all three stock categories.
Second, it urged Sebi
to introduce a new category with the same characteristics mentioned in the September 11 circular. Third, it asked Sebi
to consider prescribing weights in line with the m-cap distribution. Mid-caps currently account for about 16 per cent and small-caps about 11 per cent of India’s total m-cap.
The Sebi circular comes into effect from February 2021. However, Amfi has sought more time from the regulator for compliance.
On September 13, Sebi clarified that rebalancing was one of the many options available. The regulator has, however, stayed put on the new definition despite widespread criticism.
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.