Sebi dismisses RTI appeal in Franklin Templeton MF's wind-up case

Sebi’s response that any regulatory action initiated post-investigation is available on its website, was also viewed favourably by the appellate authority.
The appellate authority of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) for Right To Information (RTI) Act, has dismissed a query pertaining to the course of action taken by the market regulator following the wind-up of schemes by Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund (MF).

The RTI appeal raised questions on why Sebi had not made FT MF take the debt papers onto its own book and pay the money to the unitholder (the appellant). It had also asked as to why the appellant should suffer for their wrongdoing and Sebi’s silence and inaction.

Sebi in its response observed that the queries were in the nature of seeking clarification or opinion and accordingly could not be construed as ‘information’ under section 2(f) of the RTI Act.

Sebi also observed that as a stock market regulator, it conducts investigation to examine alleged or suspected violation of laws and regulations. However, post investigation, whenever violations are established, appropriate enforcement actions are taken under provisions of the Sebi act and the existing regulatory framework.

These “culminate into issuance of orders and the same are available on the Sebi website."

However, finding Sebi’s responses unsatisfactory, an appeal was filed by the unitholder.

Anand Baiwar, appellate authority under the RTI Act, did not find any “deficiencies” with Sebi’s responses. On a query pertaining to action taken by Sebi against FT MF, Baiwar said, “It is understood that the respondent (Sebi) has neither confirmed nor denied the existence of examination or investigation. I find that the same is justified where disclosure of existence of investigation or otherwise itself would amount to disclosure of exempted information”.

“Further, such examination, or investigation, may or may not establish the suspected violations or lead to enforcement actions,” he said.

He stated that maintaining confidentiality of investigation is important since reports of an investigation may result in unwarranted speculation or concern in the market, may affect evidence collection during the investigation or may result in unnecessary harm to third parties.

Sebi’s response that any regulatory action initiated post-investigation is available on its website, was also viewed favourably by the appellate authority.


Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Business Standard is now on Telegram.
For insightful reports and views on business, markets, politics and other issues, subscribe to our official Telegram channel