It has also favoured doing away with additional KYC documentation requirements for beneficial owners in case of government-related FPIs.
Changes have also been suggested regarding identification of senior managing official of FPIs and for beneficial owners of listed entities, as also regarding disclosure of personal information.
However, all new rules will apply equally to those investors using the Offshore Derivative Instruments (popularly known as P-Notes).
Besides, the panel has suggested giving six months to FPIs for compliance to new rules, after they are finalised, while the non-compliant investors can be given further 180 days to wind down their existing positions.
Sebi said the panel is also examining separately whether any recommendation to merge the FPI and NRI/OCI routes of investment can be made to the government and the Reserve Bank.
The panel has also recommended that Sebi may clarify suitable actions that FPIs need to take for divestment or re-classification of holdings as per the FDI limits, after consulting with the RBI.
It has also suggested to Sebi to consult the government to evolve a more objective criteria for defining high-risk jurisdictions.
Sebi had issued a circular in April, proposing the new norms on KYC and beneficial owner identification, the deadline for which was extended later by two months till December. The proposed move was aimed at checking any possible re-routing of funds of Indians and NRIs through overseas locations such as Mauritius, Singapore and Dubai.
However, several FPIs had expressed concerns over the proposed changes in rules and a lobby group named AMRI (Asset Management Roundtable of India) recently said the immediate impact of the new norms, if not amended, would be that USD 75-billion investment managed by OCIs, PIOs and NRIs will be disqualified from investing into India, and the funds will have to be withdrawn and liquidated within a short time-frame.
The organisation also warned that it will have severe impact on stocks and rupee.
Sebi, however, had said it is "preposterous and highly irresponsible" to claim that USD 75 billion will move out of India because of the move.