Continuing his arguments, senior counsel Shyam Divan took the court through the Aadhaar Act provisions to demonstrate that under the statute itself the demographic and biometric data of Indian citizens could be shared with private entities.
As the apex court said that if there were "deficiencies" in the Aadhaar scheme's implementation, resulting in leaks, the same could be plugged, Divan said: "It (collection of data) can't be reconciled with (working of) a democratic open society. The entire programme is bad as everyone is entitled to protect himself/herself against exposure of their demographic and biometric data.
As Divan dwelt on the scope and ramifications of various provisions of the Aadhaar Act, Justice Sikri said that 'let us assume that Aadhaar is constitutionally valid; still, we will have to decided whether it can be used for disbursal of subsidies or can be extended to other areas as well".
Justice Sikri said a line has to be drawn and the same can't be breached. Beyond that, it will be violative of privacy, the court observed.
In another poser, Justice Chandrachud asked if data collected under the Aadhaar scheme would be used only for the purposes for which it has been collected, would it ward off the dangers about which fears have been expressed before the court.
"All our personal data is anyway with private hands (collected by private agencies). Does interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference," Justice Chandrachud asked, pointing out "we are living in an extremely networked world".
Telling the court that the way Aadhaar was being linked with everything "you will have a huge proliferation of data for the purpose of identification", Divan said: "Lift your imagination much higher than where we are", understand the implications of the state possessing the biometric data of the citizens.
Telling the court that the only thing that remains a secret is the one that goes with the demise of a person, senior counsel Kapil Sibal said that there was nothing secret in the world.
He said the question here is the purposes for which Aadhaar numbers can be used, its extent and proportionality if it had to be shared with private entities.
The Constitution Bench is hearing challenges to the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme on the touchstone of the fundamental right to privacy on a batch of petitions by former Karnataka High Court Judge K.S. Puttuswamy, Magsaysay awardee Shanta Sinha, feminist researcher Kalyani Sen Menon and others.
Appearing for Justice Puttuswamy and others, Divan will continue his arguments on Wednesday.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.