provides a mechanism to the taxpayer to seek clarifications on the key issues. In the long run, this step of seeking clarifications will save the taxpayer from litigation, as well as from penal consequence.
What are the categories that have attracted the most number of disputes over the last one year?
Till now more than 80 advance rulings have come. If one peruses them, it is apparent that classification-related rulings top the chart with more than 40 rulings. This is followed by GST
applicability-related rulings (20). The balance rulings are on other aspects such as on the issue of valuation and place of supply.
How does India compare to other jurisdictions — after one year of the roll out — when it comes to GST/VAT-related disputes?
The analysis of the rulings shows that the underlying question in most of the classification disputes was about the rates of GST.
The key reason for this trend appears to be the multi-tier GST
rate slabs in India. This multi-tier GST
rate structure is a stark contrast to Value Added Tax
(VAT) in some other jurisdictions, including the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
In the UAE, VAT
was introduced on January 1, 2018, with a single rate of 5 per cent. Even the exemptions in the UAE are restricted to four items only (one of them is residential leasing). This has ensured lesser complications in the UAE VAT
law and accordingly, much lesser advance rulings (referred to as ‘Clarifications’ in the UAE VAT).
Has there been any instance of contradictory ruling on the same issue by two benches?
Recently, a few instances of contradictory rulings were observed. One such issue is that of authorities pronouncing the advance ruling
was seen as tilting more towards protection of the interest of the revenue department. In one such instance in the applicability of the rate on a solar power plant, one ruling stated that the appropriate rate is 5 per cent, whereas another ruling said its 18 per cent. One reason for these varying advance rulings is that the mechanism at present is decentralised. The GST
Council should look into the aspect of centralisation of the advance ruling
As we enter the second year of GST, do you expect a step up in tax litigation?
This trend in advance rulings is worrying as it brings back the memory of the erstwhile era where disputes relating to classification and levy/ exemption were the norm of the day. Additionally, in the coming days, views proposed in some of the advance rulings (such as levy of GST
on liquidated damages, employee recoveries, whether to treat a transaction as works contract) may not be found as acceptable and may then bring a second wave of litigation.
As we celebrate the first anniversary of GST
rollout, taxpayers expect that the GST
Council analyses the emerging trends in advance rulings and take appropriate holistic macro measures, than only addressing specific micro issues.
The writer is a chartered accountant and author of several books on GST and Gulf VAT