Third, the disinvestment programme this year has gone down under due to the lockdowns imposed to curb the spread of the coronavirus.
The curious point is that if the government had (or probably still can do in the next three months) been aggressive this year, the time was opportune for disinvestment given the high level of the markets. The valuations would have been attractive. The finance minister will probably have a more definite plan this time when the disinvestment programme is announced.
Fourth, the government would have to continue with some of the pro-poor schemes which cannot be cut down for sure and may have to be increased depending on an evaluation of the ground level situation. The kisan cash transfer, food subsidy, interest subsidy, free food for the needy, MGNREGA
allocations would deserve the same, if not higher, allocations and hence the ‘relief’ part of the budget would be significant. It would be of interest to see how these numbers look.
Finally, the crucial number would be the fiscal deficit
ratio which will probably the most challenging for the government. The fiscal deficit
ratio for FY21 is likely to be around 8-9 per cent which can come down if the government cuts expenditure drastically in the last two months. However, the total borrowings for this year are at Rs 13.1 trillion which is 6.5 per cent of the GDP. The withdrawals from cash balances and NSSF have to be added further and hence the number can at best be 8 per cent. It is not possible to aim at 3.5 per cent and there has to be a downward path traced in the budget which moves to 3 per cent in the next 3-4 years. There will also be the disadvantage of nominal GDP which even with 10 per cent real GDP growth touch around Rs 220 lkh crore. Therefore, the markets will be looking closely at this number.
The fiscal deficit
number is important also from the point of view of the future course of monetary policy which will be defined by this path. The RBI has to play a major role to facilitate the same and this becomes the pivot for future policies. The repo rate may have to be raised given the inflation trajectory, but the liquidity support measures have to be persisted with.
Madan Sabnavis is chief economist at CARE Ratings and author of “Hits & Misses: The Indian Banking Story”. Views are personal.
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.