Letter to BS: The debate over number of Chinese casualties in Galwan clash

Maxar WorldView-3 satellite image shows ‘structures’ along LAC and Patrol Point 14 in the eastern Ladakh sector of Galwan Valley photo: reuters
This refers to “Let the military prove its worth” and “Need to constantly verify facts...”, both authored by Ajai Shukla, who has been frequently writing about India-China confrontation on the LAC. Shukla occasionally contributes in The New York Times also. In “Caught between Indian and Chinese troops” (NYT, July 12), Jeffrey Gettleman mentioned, “Western intelligence agents say that China lost more than a dozen soldiers in the fight”. So far, I have not read in any article by Ajai Shukla mentioning the number of Chinese casualties in Galwan during June 15/16, though he often refers to his reliable sources while he pointedly writes about the Chinese gains. As a defence journalist and the retired colonel, Shukla is expected to comment on the Chinese casualties, especially when NYT has published the details.

Rakesh Srivastava  Lakhimpur Kheri

The author responds: The first of the two articles you cite does not mention the number of Indian casualties, so there is no cause to mention Chinese casualties either. I have not authored the second article you ascribe to me.

On your larger question, I have more than once, including in the NYT article you cite, mentioned that there were an unspecified number of Chinese casualties. I would like to be more specific, but the fact is that New Delhi has announced casualty numbers and Beijing is keeping them secret. I do not have two reliable sources on the Chinese side and, without that, I cannot cite precise numbers.

Letters can be mailed, faxed or e-mailed to: 
The Editor, Business Standard,Nehru House, 
4 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 002 Fax: (011) 23720201  ·  E-mail: letters@bsmail.in
All letters must have a postal address and telephone number

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Business Standard is now on Telegram.
For insightful reports and views on business, markets, politics and other issues, subscribe to our official Telegram channel