Targeting taxpayers

The latest dispute between the Income-Tax Department and some assessees is a good example of the difference between the intent and implementation of reform measures. Several individuals and firms have filed petitions in various courts challenging the tax notices issued during the April-June period. The law was amended earlier in the year, and allowed tax assessments to be ordinarily reopened for the previous three years. In cases of serious fraud and concealment of income of more than Rs 50 lakh, assessments can go back 10 years. However, the income-tax department extended the validity of the .....
The latest dispute between the Income-Tax Department and some assessees is a good example of the difference between the intent and implementation of reform measures. Several individuals and firms have filed petitions in various courts challenging the tax notices issued during the April-June period. The law was amended earlier in the year, and allowed tax assessments to be ordinarily reopened for the previous three years. In cases of serious fraud and concealment of income of more than Rs 50 lakh, assessments can go back 10 years. However, the income-tax department extended the validity of the old law till June 30, which allowed reopening assessments up to six years and issuing tax notices to a large number of assessees.

The tax department has argued that it extended the old law due to the second wave of Covid-19 and it is in line with the extension given to assessees in terms of compliance. The government is also reportedly exploring the option of bringing in an Ordinance if courts rule against the validity of the notices issued by the department. The government will be well advised to avoid any such step as it would go against the basic spirit of amending the law and reforming the tax administration. The objective of amending the law was to provide relief to taxpayers by reducing the scope of reopening tax assessments for previous years. Thus, extending the old provisions for three months reflects the difference between the letter and the spirit of the law. However, this disconnect is not very difficult to understand and is a result of deeper fault lines in the Indian tax administration.

India’s fiscal situation has been under stress for years and the pandemic has only worsened the problem. The basic issue is excessive pressure of targets on tax officials to increase collection to meet a target. This pressure results in tax notices, delays in refunds, reopening previous assessments, and disputes. Direct tax revenues blocked under litigation are estimated to be over Rs 9 trillion and the government has settled cases worth about Rs 1 trillion under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The fact that a large number of taxpayers who are contesting the tax department’s claims in courts didn’t come forward to settle suggests that they have a strong case.

To be fair, the government has implemented a number of reforms in the recent past, such as systems for faceless assessment and appeal, which will help bring more transparency and reduce harassment. The changes in the law to reduce the scope for reopening assessments were in the same spirit. But to genuinely improve conditions for taxpayers, the top leadership will need to set realistic tax revenue targets and stop putting pressure on tax officials to increase collection, so that indiscriminate issuing of notices and litigation are avoided. This is not to suggest that the tax department should not go after those evading taxes, but it would need to be more focused. This will require building more capacity in the department by using technology, which will enable it to approach the right assessees. At the macro level, to increase revenue, the government would need to broaden the tax base with better use of technology. It would also do well to reconsider the exemption limit for personal income tax. Chasing the same set of taxpayers with notices and extending an old law for a few months would not take the government too far.

 



Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Business Standard is now on Telegram.
For insightful reports and views on business, markets, politics and other issues, subscribe to our official Telegram channel
Key stories on business-standard.com are available to premium subscribers only.

Already a premium subscriber?

Subscribe to get an across device (Website, Mobile Web, Iphone, Ipad, and Android Phone applications) access to Premium content, Breaking News alerts, Industry Newsletters, Stock and Corporate news alerts, access to Archives and a lot more.

Read More on

INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT

INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT

I-T DEPARTMENT

TAX DISPUTES

TAX LITIGATION

OPINION

EDITORIALS


Most Read

Markets

Companies

Opinion

Latest News

Todays Paper

News you can use