Besides the company and its directors, the agency has booked 11 more entities which include three Kanpur-based companies -- RK Builders, Globiz Exim Pvt Ltd, Nirman Pvt Ltd -- represented through their directors.
These companies were corporate guarantors for Frost International, officials said.
It is alleged that they had defaulted in meeting payment obligation towards the lending banks of the consortium led by Bank of India, the officials said, adding the company and its directors, guarantors and unidentified others submitted forged documents, diverted and siphoned off the bank's funds.
The action of the company and its directors cheated the banks to the tune of over Rs 3,592.48 crore, they added.
The banks had already secured Look out Circular (LOC) against Uday Desai and 10 others on January 18, 2019. It was preceded by another LOC against Desai and 13 others on the request of Indian Overseas Bank, officials said.
The Bank Of India, in its complaint which is now part of the FIR, has said that Frost International was managed by Uday Desai, Sujay Desai, Sunil Verma and Anup Kumar Baldevraj Wadhera since its inception in 1995 and was banking with the consortium since 1996 having businesses in diverse products from agro commodities to bullion.
The company had suppliers and buyers across the globe from China to the USA with its promoters well versed in international trade.
Bank of India had given it credit facility of Rs 380.65 crore which was increased to Rs 4,061 crore with the formation of consortium of 14 banks in 2011, it said.
In addition to credit facilities from 14 banks, Indian Overseas Bank also extended credit exposure of Rs 498.51 crore outside consortium, it said, adding the company had hypothecated stocks and gave properties as collateral for the credit facilities.
The bank said that from January 2018, the account started showing signs of stress when letter of credits started devolving with member banks as export proceeds were not realised. The account was ultimately classified by the consortium as non-performing asset, it said.
"Clearly, there was a mismatch of cash flows resulting in cash crunch which was not understandable by the bankers," it said.
The banks put the company for forensic audit which revealed that there was potential diversion of funds by way of providing unsecured loans to group concerns.
It showed that there was no actual export of goods, there was a mismatch in ship movement data compared with loading and discharge port which was underlined in 18 merchant trade transaction, the bank said.
The audit showed that purchase and sales transactions amounting to Rs 9822 crore and Rs 9,889 crore respectively were among parties known to each other, it said.
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.