"Look, I am happy with lateral movement, like we saw in the first Test (at Cape Town). I have no problem with that. But when balls start exploding off a length and people start getting hit left, right and centre, I don't think that's a good pitch," he added.
The Wanderers' pitch has coming under criticism from former cricketers and commentators for its dangerous nature.
The talk of the entire third day was about the uneven bounce of the track with some of the cracks on good length and short of it opening up.
As many as three Indian and one South African batsmen were hit on day three as the ball rose from good length area.
Murali Vijay and Virat Kohli were hit on their hands in the morning session, in the 31st and 35th overs respectively, while Ajinkya Rahane was hit too post lunch, in the 58th over. All instances happened off the bowling of Kagiso Rabada.
Later in the day chasing 241 runs for a win, Deal Elgar was struck on his hand by Bhuvneshwar Kumar in the third over of their second innings.
Earlier in the day, two umpires Aleem Dar and Ian Gould
had a long chat in the middle and inspected the pitch before play resumed. Surprisingly, there is no official word from the match referee on this issue yet.
Holding, here on commentary duty with official broadcaster Super Sport, also criticised the pitch on air as well.
He rated the pitch "2 out of 100" and called for the abandonment of the game as early as the pre-lunch session.
"They should have called it off when (Murali) Vijay got hit," Holding later explained, off air.
"This is not a cricket pitch, this is dangerous. Call it off, forget it. You can't play cricket on that. I have no idea what has gone wrong but I know it's not a good cricket pitch," he said.
"The last time I saw something like this, the match was abandoned in Jamaica in 1998, and it didn't even last this long."
From the beginning of the match, the ball was kicking off length from Corlett Drive End but today the ball started rearing up from Golf Course End as well.
This behaviour of the wicket also drew sharp criticism from other former cricketers, also here on commentary duty.
"Uneven bounce is the problem, not lateral movement. It is quite dangerous from batting point of view when you have tall bowlers hitting the deck hard and bowling around 140. It is dangerous and it's not ideal," said former South African captain Kepler Wessels.
"We want a good contest between bat and ball, and this pitch is not providing that. I would give it 3 out of 10."
Former South African captain Shaun Pollock had deemed it a bad pitch as early as day two, and agreed with both Holding and Wessels that the game should be abandoned.
Former Indian skipper Sunil Gavaskar, also here on commentary duty with Super Sport, criticised the inconsistent bounce of the track but didn't go as far as calling for the match to be abandoned.
"The Indian batsmen should be commended for scoring 240- odd because it is a difficult pitch no doubt. No batsman can feel certain on a wicket like this and the unpredictable bounce makes it dangerous as well. But I don't think the match should be abandoned," Gavaskar told PTI, just as Elgar was hit by Bhuvneshwar early in the South Africa's second innings.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.