Justice Kirubakaran had held that maternity leave can be treated as service period while allowing the plea of a woman government doctor who was not allowed to join PG medical course on the grounds that she did not complete two years continuous service, excluding the maternity leave.
He had then observed that not only the newborn, but the "reborn mother" also required "nurturing care, affection and proper rest and highlighted the significance of breast feeding, saying there was no substitute for mothers milk and that even "so-called divine nectar could not be equal" to it.
In the present case, the petitioners approached the High Court,seeking to quash Clause 9 (a) (i) of the prospectus for admission to Post Graduate degree/diploma courses in Tamil Nadu Government Medical Colleges and government seats in Self Financing Medical colleges in the state for 2018-19 in so far as it excludes the period of maternity and earned leave from the period of continuous service for awarding incentive marks.
Differing from the order, Justice Vaidyanathan today said that incentive marks for serving in remote, hilly and difficult areas cannot be granted to the government doctors without them doing 'actual service'.
Earlier, Additional Advocate General S T S Moorthy submitted that the government was considering maternity leave as service period for all other contingencies, including promotion. But when it comes to admissions to PG medical courses, it cannot be considered as service period, since the candidate must have completed two years of service, he said.
As for the incentive marks, he said without actual service, such a benefit cannot be granted to the petitioner.
Opposing the submissions, the counsel for petitioners said when maternity leave was a constitutional right, and treated as service period, the state cannot deny incentive marks.
Wondering whether granting such incentive marks without actual service would amount to discrimination against men who do not get any benefits like paternity leave, Justice Vaidyanathan said he was disagreeing with the order of Justice Kirubakaran in granting incentive benefit for the period of service not actually done.
"...For availing incentive marks there should be actual service, unless and until service is rendered in remote, difficult and hilly area incentive marks cannot be awarded. The incentive marks cannot be demanded as a matter of right unless actual service is rendered," he said in the order.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.