"There was pressure from the government, but saying that we had succumbed to the pressure is completely wrong. Whatever decisions were taken, were taken by the Reserve Bank. There was pressure, but there was no decision that was influenced by the pressure from the government," he said at a panel discussion organised to discuss his memoir, 'Who Moved My Interest Rate?'.
Subbarao, who was RBI governor from September 5, 2008 to September 4, 2013 under two finance ministers — Pranab Mukherjee and P Chidambaram, in his recently released tell-all book has stated that both of them pressed for interest rate cuts to revive investments even though accelerating inflation called for the opposite.
Chidambaram, who was part of the panel discussion today, said the UPA government did a lot of "heavy lifting" since he took charge as the finance minister in August 2012 and that he had expected RBI to take some risk and cut interest rates.
"Yes, inflation did not decline dramatically after I took over, but a lot of heavy lifting were done by the government. From November 2013, inflation began to decline till May 2014 ... Since the government was doing some heavy lifting and we were taking determined steps, we thought that RBI should take some risk," Chidambaram said.
In his book, Subbarao says the tension with Chidambaram in 2012 led to the then finance minister ignoring him at an official dinner in Mexico. Chidambaram has, however, countered the assertion saying he was always courteous.
When that paragraph from the book was read out at today's discussion, the former finance minister sought a response from Subbarao.
Subbarao on his part said it could be construed as his perception about the situation.
"After all, this is subject to perception, it is not objectively verifiable. And it is quite possible that I misread the situation. It is quite possible that if Mr Chidambaram denies or if he has no recall of that, I completely agree with that... We should not persist with this discussion," he said.
Chidambaram said despite differences the UPA government did give Subbarao a second term, unlike Rajan who will demit office at the end of the first three-year term on September 4.
While Subbarao batted for a five-year tenure of the RBI governor, Chidambaram, too, said has "no difficulty in accepting 5 years as a good idea".
When the moderator suggested that the UPA government should have given a five-year tenure to Rajan, Chidambaram said: "If I knew that another government will come and not extend, I would have done that".
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.