The plea claimed that Kumar was not eligible for the post as he was over 62 years old and several others were unable to apply for the post due to this condition.
When Bhushan termed it as "arbitrary and discriminatory", the bench observed, "if somebody, who could not apply due to this and says there is violation of Article 14 (equality before law), we can hear him".
The counsel contended that the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) was a very important institution of the country as it was the nodal agency for CBI.
When Bhushan said there were "many others" who could not apply, the bench said, "those many others have not come before us. You cannot come on their behalf."
"It is not your case that the advertisement is per-se contrary to the statute," the bench said, adding "if somebody whose life has been invaded upon comes to us, we will hear him. The PIL (public interest litigation) is for those who cannot afford to come (to the court). You cannot espouse the cause of somebody else."
To this, Bhushan said there were lots of people who could not apply and they cannot come to the court as they were "under a fear" that the government may victimise them.
"Let us assure them that there is no fear. We are here to take care of it," Justice Gogoi said.
Sharad Kumar, a former chief of National Investigation Agency (NIA), was on June 10 this year appointed as the vigilance commissioner. He had retired in September last year after heading the NIA, the anti-terror probe organisation, for over four years.
According to the official order, Kumar was appointed vigilance commissioner in the CVC for a term of four years or till he attained the age of 65. According to the rules, Kumar's tenure will come to an end in October 2020.
The Commission comprises the central vigilance commissioner and two vigilance commissioners. Besides Kumar, K V Chowdary is the current CVC and T M Bhasin is the other vigilance commissioner.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)