"In a case like the present, we have to check what the dominating purpose of the Indian Premiere League (IPL) is. It is either a sports activity, or a commercial activity and therefore, will rank last on the water supply priority list," the bench said.
"However, the IPL organisers can't say that since they use this water not just for pitch maintenance but also for the toilets and sanitation in the stadiums, it must get top priority," it said.
The bench was hearing a PublicInterest Litigation (PIL) filed by the NGO Loksatta Movement, opposing the IPL matches scheduled in Mumbai and some other cities in Maharashtra in the year 2016, because of the prevailing drought-like situation in Maharashtra at the time.
While the 2016 matches were shifted out of the state following the HC's order, the PIL had also urged the court to ensure that the provisions of the state as well as the national water policy were adhered to for the IPL matches in the future.
Maharashtra's own water policy and the national water policy mandates that when it comes to water supply, the first priority must be given to drinking and sanitation purposes, the second to agriculture, third to industrial needs, the fourth to sports, and the last to religious, and recreational activities.
On a previous hearing, the high court had directed the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA) and the Board of Cricket Control of India (BCCI) to clarify whether the IPL was a sports activity or a recreational activity.
The high court said that it would decide upon the same following a detailed hearing next Tuesday.
The MCA, meanwhile, has maintained that irrespective of its placement on the water priority list, it will not use potable water either purchased privately, or provided by the civic body, for watering the pitches and for other maintenance work at the Wankhede stadium during this year's Indian Premiere League matches.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)