Inc faced new calls for regulation from within US Congress
and was hit with questions about personal data safeguards on Saturday after reports a political consultant gained inappropriate access to 50 million users’ data starting in 2014.
disclosed the issue in a blog post on Friday, hours before media reports that conservative-leaning Cambridge Analytica, a data company known for its work on Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, was given access to the data and may not have deleted it. Facebook
has suspended Cambridge Analytica, even as the company claimed no wrongdoing.
The scrutiny presented a new threat to Facebook’s reputation, which was already under attack over Russians’ alleged use of Facebook
tools to sway American voters before and after the 2016 US elections.
“It’s clear these platforms can't police themselves,” Democratic US Senator Amy Klobuchar tweeted. “They say ‘trust us’. Mark Zuckerberg
needs to testify before Senate Judiciary,” she added, referring to Facebook’s CEO and a committee she sits on.
In the UK too, a parliamentary committee examining the issue of disinformation and fake news has accused Facebook
of misleading MPs by downplaying the risk of users’ data being shared without their consent and said it wanted Zuckerberg to explain allegations.
said the root of the problem was that researchers and Cambridge Analytica
lied to it and abused its policies, but critics on Saturday threw blame at Facebook
as well, demanding answers on behalf of users and calling for new regulation.
“The lid is being opened on the black box of Facebook's data practices, and the picture is not pretty,” said Frank Pasquale, a University of Maryland law professor who has written about Silicon Valley’s use of data.
Pasquale said Facebook's response that data had not technically been stolen seemed to obfuscate the central issue that data was apparently used in a way contrary to the expectations of users.